Tag Cloud
Math (58) iPad (23) Science (22) interactive (21) Reading (21) Elementary Students (18) Digital Storytelling (16) Language Arts (16) App of the Week (15) book apps (15) Social Studies (14) Writing (14) conference (13) Art (12) Free (12) IEAR News and Info (11) Literacy (11) numbers (11) Teacher App (11) IEAR Site Related (10) Presentation (10) Spelling (10) student app (9) math app (8) Music (8) Podcast (8) Special Education (8) Tips (8) creative (7) cross curricular (7) Flash Cards (7) Geography (7) Tricks (7) Android (6) Foreign Language (6) History (6) Interviews (6) iPod (6) Kindergarten (6) math apps (6) preschool (6) Professional Development (6) Video (6) Vocabulary (6) Animals (5) apps (5) Colors (5) create (5) eBook (5) education (5) iOS (5) K-12 (5) Letters (5) Math Facts (5) Organization (5) phonics (5) Productivity (5) Shapes (5) The App Podcast (5) Volunteer (5) awards (4) Communication (4) Drawing (4) E-Books (4) EDAPP (4) EduMacNation (4) Fractions (4) Geometry (4) Google (4) IPhone (4) ISTE 2010 (4) Memory (4) NECC (4) Notetaking (4) Outreach Program (4) Screencasting (4) Spanish (4) Special Needs (4) teacher (4) animation (3) audio (3) brainpop (3) brainstorming (3) content creation (3) Game (3) Give Away (3) Grammar (3) Impact on Education (3) internet safety (3) ipads (3) ITunes Store (3) Jeremy Brueck (3) LanSchool (3) Measurement (3) middle school (3) One-to-One (3) physical education (3) physics (3) picture book (3) Reading Apps (3) Study (3) Syncing (3) Teacher Experience (3) travel (3) Words (3)
Content

-------------------------------------------------------------

Purpose: IEAR.org / Overview: IEAR / Conversation: Community NING
Bookmarks:  Diigo Group / Research:
Collection / IEAR News: Scoops 
Schools: Lists of Apps
/ iDevice: Initiatives / Tutorials: Wiki / Apple VPP: Wiki /

-------------------------------------------------------------

 

-------------------------------------------------------------

I Education Apps Review - App Reviews and Educational Commentary

Entries in Purpose of IEAR (2)

Friday
Mar182011

Purpose of IEAR.org

Originally posted 2010

Community and collaboration is the most vital aspect for improving education. Technology is really at a point where we can make a difference as a collective body in so many ways. Sometimes we just need a spark to ignite a movement ...

I started I Education Apps Review for a few reasons. IEAR.org was my attempt to start making sense out of the app revolution and how apps and mobile learning may or may not make a difference in the classroom. When I first began doing reviews, I was overwhelmed by the shear number of "bad apps" under the educational category. I still am to be honest ... I found myself overly impressed early on with weak apps because they had potential. As I became more critical and poignant with my reviews, app developers began to take more notice. Several applications were improved because of this feedback. There is a lot of potential there as we all want to make a difference. I repeatedly would state, "if only we could talk with the developers to improve the effectiveness of these apps!" IEAR.org was born ...

I Education Apps Review is now a community of over 500 educators, administrators and app developers. There is a lot of potential power in bringing these communities together and we hope to see a lot of growth within mobile learning because of the power of this community. We now have over 30 volunteer "educator" app reviewers who are taking a closer look at the overall educational value of "educational apps". We hope that others see the value of this collaboration and decide to join. We have some amazing people involved in this community that include some of our industry's most well known to classroom teachers who are just beginning to dip their toes into the online professional network world and there is a lot of potential power there!

Basically, IEAR.org has become a community and not an individual endeavor.  Members of this community have taken ownership in many ways as we are a true grass roots movement. Check out the list of members who are "featured for either being a community organizer, app reviewer or volunteer in some fashion". App reviewers and community organizers are free to use the IEAR concept for their own work moving forward. The community is completely embedded in an open creative commons license. While IEAR.org is not on the scale of the Classroom 2.0 NING (several others as well), it is an attempt to marry several educational communication tools into one community. 

 

Here is the basic disclaimer for the site. I Education Apps Review's goal and or focus is to take a look at practical, useful, and educationally sound ways to use mobile learning in the classroom. The iPhone, iPad, iPod Touch and other similar devices such as Android phones are amazing pieces of technology. We believe that these devices have a place in today's classroom as long as they are utilized properly.

We do not intend to bash application developers or their applications with our reviews. We intend to take a closer look at these educationally marketed applications in the education category or the educational / game category in the ITunes Store to make a determination as to the value of their impact in education. We would also like to expand a little beyond this category and talk about applications not marketed as educational to see if they can make an impact in the classroom.

After discussing key information about the application such as who created them and how much, we intend to evaluate the application as to its educational value. Each application will get a "Grade Level" attached to it and a grade for "Purpose", "Program Functionality", and Educational Value. Finally, we will make a decision on whether or not to recommend the application for personal use and school use...

Can this community be improved? Absolutely ... Is there a lot of potential for arguments as to what constitutes good educational value for these apps and devices? Absolutely ... Are these devices and apps simply a continuation of "traditional teaching" methodology? Perhaps ... but ... Answering these questions is a lot of fun and the purpose of this community. IEAR.org is all about trying to have a discussion about the value of these devices and these apps without corporate involvement.

Here is the IEAR.org App Review Philosophy: Please keep in mind as we move forward, our overarching goal is to grow and improve a community that does not reflect individual contributions but rather a voice for all of us to use as a call to improve the use of this technology in the learning process for our students. We hope that you will take ownership of IEAR in some fashion. While I may have started this community and the initial IEAR movement, all recognition will ultimately fall on the community as a whole. I look forward to learning so much from you all as we work together moving forward. Your reviews are your property but they are to published on the IEAR site under an open Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 license. We highly encourage you to cross post your review to your own blog as well. As an official reviewer, you can use the IEAR logos, name, and information created in any of your own personal work. This is a community and not an individual effort.

As we tell our new community members on a regular basis ... I look forward to hearing your feedback on how we can improve this community. Dive right in and give us your thoughts on any apps, these devices, etc. ... Let's help each other find a better way to utilize the potential of these devices as a community of educators, interested administrators, and concerned app developers ...

Well ... IEAR.org would love to have you join the community and take ownership of the process ...

Friday
Aug132010

What do teachers really want in an "Educational App"?


When you look at the majority of app reviews done through the IEAR community, there are some very common trends that stand out.  The problem with the majority of educational apps is that they are created are created by non-educators to make money.  The vast majority of apps are really "drill and practice" apps.  The educational value of these apps is very debatable.  As a result, some of the very best apps that have made an impact in education are not even within the education category.  They might fall in the gaming, productivity, lifestyle, and navigation categories. 

Educators are clamoring for the following types of apps:

  1. Teachers want apps that teachers can input their own "curriculum" into the app in some fashion.  The majority of apps are locked down with regard to content and they can not be manipulated enough to meet the teacher's specific needs.
  2. Teachers want the ability to pull "data" from the apps in some fashion.  They want to see progress, chart trends, or see areas of need that the students might have. The trick is to make sure that data that gets pulled is easily manipulated by well known tools already in existant as they don't want a new format to have to convert in some fashion. 
  3. Educational apps in general are too focused on "drill and practice" and there needs to be a greater emphasis upon "constructivist" types of activities.  Additionally, there needs to be a convenient way to port over content that is created on these devices to other devices.
  4. The greatest area of need for a creative app would be in the form of "programming".  For whatever reason, Apple has disallowed apps that have functionality like MIT's application "Scratch".  Apps like a "Scratch" app would allow students to learn the foundations of programming by scaffolding the ideas and techniques in grade appropriate ways.
  5. There is a growing trend for apps to allow multiple mobile learning devices to work in conjunction. This needs to continue.  For example, teachers want to use a central app on their mobile device such as an iPad that allows them to connect with students individually on their mobile learning devices.  The trick is that these applications need to connect seamlessly without a need to troubleshoot the connection regularly.
  6. Teachers want to feel in control of their students "freedom" to provide a safe and secure learning environment.  Teachers would like to provide more access and allow their students to learn independently more but within a "safe and guarded" environment as well.  
  7. Apps need to continue to be developed that allow students and teachers to access their cloud computing resources. Specifically, Google Education Apps are making a big impact in schools and yet mobile learning devices struggle with accessing that information effectively and efficiently.As new initiatives come online, they need to work well with multiple platforms.
  8. Finally, teachers and district technology coordinators need better systems in place to control school owned mobile learning technology from a management standpoint.  LanSchool has an Edapp initative that has been rolled out but it is still early. Additionally, Apple themselves are trying to clean up the educational volume licensing but at first glance, there are more questions than answers at this point.   

These are the areas that I have heard most from the IEAR community.  While the IEAR community is growing, it is very difficult to keep up with the growth of the new app paradigm.  The app paradigm is an example of how technology is changing and reinventing itself faster than schools can keep up with.  We need more educators to share their thoughts about apps, what makes a good one and how to improve the existing ones.  Please join our community and think about becoming an app reviewer. 

The last question I have for you all is, "Are there other areas of need?"  Am I missing an area of need or trend?  What would make the "app paradigm" more educational for education? Your comments are greatly appreciated!

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta